I hardly ever shoot Kodak Portra 400; I tend to find Fuji 400H suits me better in terms of the overall colour palette I like so I thought it would be interesting to experiment with pulling some Portra 400 in development to see whether I can find a look that I like with this film stock. I actually think that Portra 160 does a better job with indoor portraits where as Portra 400 is wonderful outside. PORTRA 160 Film is the ideal choice for portrait, fashion 4 seconds at f45, 1 stop soft GND filter. The reproduction of the colors is restrained and quite refreshing, without really looking cool. July 30, 2020. eagles cap space 2021. I do expect that I could have remedied a good deal of that in settings in the scan or in PS after but again, all of the presented images are straight out of the scanner’s software. Portra 160 and 400 Reciprocity Failure Surprisingly, the reciprocity failure for 160 and 400 seem to follow the exact same curve. Portra 400 rated at 800 and pushed one stop is also equally great. I honestly expected Portra 160 to shine here but I ho… Similar to the portraits above, Portra 800 tends to turn whites yellow in a fairly unattractive way. Change ). As perhaps could have been expected, I didn’t prefer one film over the rest in all contexts. In addition, the Kodak Portra 160 is intended for digital processing. Portra 400 was introduced by Kodak in 1998, and was redesigned in 2006 and again in 2010. The 160 was shot from 11am until 2pm, whereas the 400 from 2 to 4pm during winter time. Very interesting, I have shot a few rolls of Portra 160, and just the one roll of Portra 800 which I pushed one stop – was very happy with the results! They are successors of the professional Vericolor films (VPS and VPL), which succeeded Ektacolor films earlier. For Fuji, it looks likes the only choice you have is Superia 400. Portra 160 rated at 320 and pushed one stop is pretty incredible. We have seen examples of Portra 400 pushed, even 3 stops. You will be banned!

I happen to really like the Porta 400NC myself, and have found it No. The same updates that were implemented to Portra 400 in 2010 were now being made for Portra 160 and although Kodak was stopping the production of the variety of these films (NC & VC), they were now producing the highest quality stock showing that quality … ( Log Out /  For those that don’t already know, Kodak offers two other variants in the Portra family: Portra 160 and Portra 800. While I know a lot of people love the film, I can count on one hand how many shots I liked from an entire pro pack shot in Banff (albeit, the three I got that were winners were my absolute favorites from the entire trip). Portra 400 was introduced back in 1998. Going much easier on this “slower” emulsion, I didn’t do too many crazy things to the new Portra 160. As perhaps could have been expected, I didn’t prefer one film over the rest in all contexts. I loved the way those colors turned out. For the tower, all three returned a pretty distinct color palette – so much so that I went back and rescanned each with the expectation of getting more uniformity then but the scans came back virtually the same as the first pass – that all 3 are distinctly different. Kodak Portra. (please add 'portra' to your photos' tags) Digital photos with VSCO filters are NOT ALLOWED! Finally, for the vertical tunnel at the OSU campus, I really think the saturation of Portra 800 shined. For us, Portra 400 has never been a big contender with Portra 800. portra 160 vs 400rose cut diamond in a pave setting. They quickly won over portrait and wedding photographers for outstanding grain structure and speed. For exposure testing data on Portra 400, Portra 400 shot and developed at 800, Portra 800, and 8 other film stocks, please refer to this article. Negative Feedback, the creative project helmed by London-based photographer George Muncey, took to familiar streets with randomly-chosen rolls of film in order to make a truly unbiased comparison between our favorite Color Negative 400 Film and the equally incredible Portra 400 … Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. I am using a pair of Mamiya 645E SLR's so I will be using 120 film. (please add 'portra' to your photos' tags) Digital photos with VSCO filters are NOT ALLOWED! All provided images were the converted negatives straight from the scanner software included with the v600. Do you think the 400 will have fine enough grain for an 11x14 or should I stick with the 160. ( Log Out /  In this video, Film Supply Club does a side by side comparison of two of the most classic film stocks: Kodak Portra 400 and Fuji Pro 400H. Continue reading below to find out more about Kodak Portra 400 vs. Kodak Portra 800 film stocks. (please add 'portra' to your photos' tags) Digital photos with VSCO filters are NOT ALLOWED! It's plenty fine grained enough for me, really superb film. I prefer the look of Portra for skin tones. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. We primarily shoot with Fuji 400H and love how it renders, so we don’t tend to shoot Portra 400 during the day. Kodak Portra 160 is a versatile film and does incredibly well in situations like snow, desert, and beach scenes. Where Portra 800 tends to disappoint is when it’s under-exposed. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Those who need more film speed may be relieved to know that Kodak still offers Portra 400 and 800, both of which are fine films in their own right. My first year of shooting film Part 11 (Read Part 10 here) After shooting 13 rolls of Kodak Portra 400 I thought it was time to give Ektar a try, as was suggested by some people who read my previous posts. Kodak Professional Portra 800. And of those films, the 400 speed is the most popular as it lets in more light than a film like Kodak’s Portra160. VISION3 500T was baked from the ground up to be a flexible, hybrid process motion picture film capable of handling extreme punishment by filmmakers and Kodak Portra 400 and 160 both have VISION3 DNA as part of their makeup. Discussion in 'Film and Processing' started by mike_gammill, Feb 9, 2012. Other than the big two, B&H carries Agfa, plus two other, Cinestill and Lomography, neither of which I've heard of. Mike Gammill. Portra Strengths. Originally created in 1998, Kodak Portra film was made for portrait and wedding photography. Portra 160 is the finest grain of the three Portra’s, Its low iso makes it great for daylight shooting and it’s warmth makes it ideal for portraiture. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Of course, with film, depending on how it’s shot, developed, printed or scanned, results can vary greatly. The Kodak Portra 160 is tuned to the reproduction of skin tones in the northwestern culture, he is primarily a portrait film. It’s so robust it will capture in most genres and Kodak has a range of ISO’s to help you out (160, 400 and 800) and a reputation for being able to push this a number of stops. This film has very good exposure latitude which means it does well with overexposure. I first fell in love with it after photographing Daniel one morning in our bedroom. UC was not a Portra … What changed between the two rolls is the light condition. As for pushing film, pushing is when you rate the film HIGHER than the box speed. Kodak Portra 160 Film Review by Sarah Collier. As the name implies, it’s intended for portrait photography, but can be used for many other types of photography. I’m not sure that my opinion between the three is really going to change. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Lenses: 80mm f/2.8 N, 150mm f/3.5 N, 300mm f/5.6 N-ULD, Lighting (Portrait Only): 2 Profoto B1X with diffusers. The 160 was shot from 11am until 2pm, whereas the 400 from 2 to 4pm during winter time. It’s similar to Portra 160, but with more contrast, saturation and grain. Portra 400 offers a solid balance between creative colour variability and consistency, but is most certainly behaving in a way inconsistent to Portra 160. Do you think the 400 will have fine enough grain for an 11x14 or should I stick with the 160. Is this based on experience or just some thought that 400 film must be? Kodak Portra 160 Film Review by Sarah Collier. The new Portra 400 recipe is a little more accurate to the film, in my opinion. Portra 160 and Portra 400. Admittedly, this is by no means a scientific test- if I wanted to be more accurate I would need to test Portra 400 and 800, side to side under the same conditions. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. It's funny, because I hear that Portra 400 has a lot more latitude than the 160 counterpart. We primarily shoot with Fuji 400H and love how it renders, so we don’t tend to shoot Portra 400 during the day. CineStill 50D vs Kodak Portra 160: Here is a non-scientific comparison of 35mm CineSill 50D film vs. 35mm Kodak Portra 160 film. The reproduction of the colors is restrained and quite refreshing, without really looking cool. The Film World Takes a Giant Step Towards the Grave With Just One Word: ‘Discontinued’, Nearly 15 Times Bigger Than Full Frame and Considerably Cheaper: Fstoppers Reviews the Intrepid 4x5 MK4, A Primer to Shooting Film in 2020: Film Stocks, The Unofficial Film of the 'Film Look’: A Long-Term Review of Kodak Portra 400, How to Create a Glitch Art Effect in Photoshop, Magnum Publishes a Code of Conduct and Announces an Independent Investigation as David Alan Harvey Takes Legal Action, Processing Images in Black and White for Print, How Bad Is JPEG? Long exposure and a high-speed film are always somewhat of a contradiction. Kodak recently contacted me about testing the new Portra 160 film which was released last month (yes, new types of film are still being manufactured); and because I never say, “No” to free film, I happily accepted. Portra 160 has the same color saturation and contrast as 160NC and finer grain than NC or VC. Anything shot on Kodak Portra film, whether 160, 400, 800, VC or Tungsten, 35mm or 120 or LF - we want it all. So in 2010, Kodak Portra 400 NC and Kodak Portra VC 400 both ceased to exist as they merged together and became the simple, singular Kodak Portra 400 we have today. This article is going to compare Kodak films Portra 160, Portra 400, and Portra 800. Thus, the Kodak Portra 160 can be excellently scanned. Portra 160: Portra 400: Portra 800: And for the grand finale, ultra film geek experience…we shot a few other exposures too, ranging from 3 under to 4 over, for Fuji 400H, Portra 160, Portra 400 and Portra 800. Slide Film vs Color Negative: Portra 160, Provia 100F & Velvia 100 July 26, 2018 By Morgan 5 Comments Film is on the resurgence as of recent and we … For exposure testing data on Portra 400, Portra 400 shot and developed at 800, Portra 800, and 8 other film stocks, please refer to this article. Kodak Ektar 100 Vs Portra 400 In Greece – By Aukje August 25, 2016. Both of these films are around the same ISO but quite different in contrast and saturation. In the original article, I used the exact same camera and lens for each series, changing only the back to rotate between the 3 film stocks. In photographic terms, this infusion of VISI… So thank you for showing!Drew Chambers is a former high school teacher and current master's student at Harvard University. Images made with 800 look more like a traditional color negative film, which is welcome considering how close to digital perfection images from Portra 160 and 400 can be. Anyway, let’s look at some samples of the Portra 160 so you can get an idea of its look. All told, we took 3 different sets of portraits (though only posting one) and in all 3, Portra 800 was far too saturated. Later they would release an 800 speed Portra and a C-41 B&W Portra. All told, we took 3 different sets of portraits (though only posting one) and in all 3, Portra 800 was far too saturated. Just like its higher speed counterpart, Portra 160 quickly found its place in my camera bag. What changed between the two rolls is the light condition. Mike Gammill. I put the data into Excel and cleaned it up a bit (for example, 8 seconds metered exposure time certainly needs more correction than 4 seconds, contrary to the data I got from Peter) and found a best-fit curve. ( Log Out /  I shoot Portra 400 in 35mm. The camera used was a Mamiya 645 Pro TL and three lenses were used: 80mm f/2.8 N, 150mm f/3.5 N, 300mm f/5.6 N-ULD. The last update in our recent history occurred in 2011, when Kodak updated their Portra 160 series. I have a client who wants her daughter's wedding shot with film. Samples of Kodak Portra 160. Let’s take a look between the Portra 400 and 800 films in more depth below. For me, the most interesting shots came from the Portra 400. Colour film. For an additional reference of Portra 400 shot and developed at 800, please refer to this article. Discussion in 'Film and Processing' started by mike_gammill, Feb 9, 2012. Of the three, it is the most saturated and felt over the top in some of the comparisons. Kodak announced in February 2011 that Portra 160 was to be similarly replaced by a single version like the 400 and incorporate the same upgrades as the new 400 speed version. Kodak Portra 400, 35mm // Leica M6, Leica 35mm f/2 Summicron. Thus, the Kodak Portra 160 can be excellently scanned. For me, the most interesting shots came from the Portra 400. This means that colors will be rendered differently than other films such as the well-known Fuji 400H. Lomography vs. Kodak Portra, a Color Negative Comparison with Negative Feedback! Still, the grain in 400 Portra is not 250% larger than in 160 Portra, so the 6X9 is the right choice if grain is your concern. It has medium contrast and low saturation making a great alternative to the more saturated Ektar 100. To ensure consistency throughout the experiment, all of the shots were taken using the exact same camera/lens combo. Special thanks to Matt Seal for being generous with letting us use his studio, Dr. H for being an uncomfortable model, and Nevin Johnson for his help with the scanning. It has medium contrast and low saturation making a great alternative to the more saturated Ektar 100. FPP Gang at Macs Diner - New Portra 400 shot @ 6400, 2-stop push! You will be banned! He fell back in love with film years ago while living in Charleston, SC and hasn't looked back since. 160 Film KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 160 Film features a significantly finer grain structure for improved scanning and enlargement capability in today's workflow, while retaining the exceptionally smooth and natural skin tone reproduction that the PORTRA Film family is renowned for. KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400 Film KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400 is the world's finest grain high-speed color negative film. Having shot through nearly 100 rolls of Portra 400, I’m rarely surprised how those shots turn out and as I expected – its middle of the road saturation, low grain and its dynamic range still make it the film to beat. For Kodak, you now have the choice of Portra 160, 400, or 800 or Ektar 100. In early 2019 he started a website about film photography. And then, to make decisions harder, Kodak introduced the Ultra Color (UC) film in ISOs of 100 and 400. kodak professional portra 160nc, 160vc, 400nc, 400vc, and 800 films • e-4040 4 Fluorescent and High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Use the color-compensating filters and exposure adjustments in the tables below as starting points to expose PORTRA Films Apr 7, 2014 #15 Kodak Portra is a daylight balanced ISO 160 film famous for capturing natural skin tones. Kodak Ektar VS Kodak Portra 160. Slide - Fuji Provia 100F. The original Portra 400 recipe is one of the most frustrating recipes I’ve created, but it also produces great results sometimes. Cos its ace. Photographer and fellow member of the club, Morgan Roberts, also supplied these two images for before and after comparison using the Kodak Portra 160 preset in RNI Films 4 PRO. Steve Anchell | May 1, 2007 It is interesting that as digital imaging began its ascendancy film reached an all-time high in quality: hue, saturation, and sharpness, all of which meant digital had to try harder to be better. Portra 400 x Flash I actually think that Portra 160 does a better job with indoor portraits where as Portra 400 is wonderful outside. Experiment 2: Kodak Portra 160 vs. Portra 400 vs. Portra 800. by Madison Hyer. Portra 400 vs. 160. ( Log Out /  Portra loves to show off yellows, oranges, and reds. As for pushing film, pushing is when you rate the film HIGHER than the box speed. Anything shot on Kodak Portra film, whether 160, 400, 800, VC or Tungsten, 35mm or 120 or LF - we want it all. Images made with 800 look more like a traditional color negative film, which is welcome considering how close to digital perfection images from Portra 160 and 400 can be. Cos its ace. Portra 800 vs Portra 400. I've heard people shooting Portra 400 from 100/200-1600+ in a single roll without any processing changes. As observed above, however, whether you can hand-hold the bigger camera as well as the 35 is another issue, that may matter more to image quality. This film has very good exposure latitude which means it does well with overexposure. All of the shots were scanned using an Epson V600 and no further adjusts following the scanner software’s inversion were made. Anything shot on Kodak Portra film, whether 160, 400, 800, VC or Tungsten, 35mm or 120 or LF - we want it all. So much so that they looked a bit distasteful. Kodak Portra 160 and 400: Portra is all about the subtleties. If you're printing, say, 16x20 from 35mm then it might be worth going to 160, but up to 11x14 I think Portra 400 is a great film. Since releasing the film in 1998, Kodak has also updated the Portra 160 and Portra 400 films to improve image and scanning quality. So pushing Portra 400 one stop (+1) would be shooting it at 600 iso. This has been available since mid-2011 in 135, 120, 220 and sheet format. "Way too grainy?" Los Angeles. Cos its ace. Kodak Portra 160 is a versatile film and does incredibly well in situations like snow, desert, and beach scenes. Overall, I preferred Portra 800 over 160 and 400 in most situations with a strict exception to portraits. Kodak Portra 400 and CineStill 800T or Kodak VISION3 500T 5219– the film that provides the base for CineStill 800T – are modern photographic films designed to be used as part of a digital workflow. 2 12 Share Tweet. (Availability info from B&H). This article is going to compare Kodak films Portra 160, Portra 400, and Portra 800. Unsurprisingly to me, I didn’t really care for most of the examples of Portra 160. Kodak’s Professional Portra 160 & 400 VC And NC; Four New Films For The Working Pro. Kodak Portra can be bought in the UK for £5 a roll for 36 exposures (£25 for a 5 pack of Kodak Portra 1… Under-exposed images take on the dreaded green shadows so familiar to color negative shooters. For those that don’t already know, Kodak offers two other variants in the Portra family: Portra 160 and Portra 800. Portra film also requires less available light (especially Portra 400 which has a very similar look to Kodak Portra 160)(or Kodak Portra 800). Portra 400 was right in the middle but in a scene I would have preferred to remain bright and airy feeling, I preferred no yellow tint. New Kodak Portra 160 Kodak's Portra 160 website Kodak's FAQ Kodak's Tech Pub E-4051 (PDF) 135-36 propack (5 rolls)Catalog# 6031959 120 propack (5 rolls)Catalog# 1808674 220 propack (5 rolls)Catalog# 8273773 10 Sheet 4 x 5 inchCatalog# 1710516 10 Sheet 8 x 10 inchCatalog# 8493751 RULES: 1) Only post photos in the pool with the new Portra 160 film or … So pushing Portra 400 one stop (+1) would be shooting it at 600 iso. Madison is a mathematician turned statistician based out of Columbus, OH. Negative - Kodak Portra 400. Slide - Kodak E100G ... Vintage - Technicolor 2 (Approx.) CineStill 50D is a relatively new film whereas Kodak Portra has been around for years (in various forms). To accomplish this, 3 different film backs were used, each loaded with a different Kodak Portra film. For us, Portra 400 has never been a big contender with Portra 800. Portra 160 is the finest grain of the three Portra’s, Its low iso makes it great for daylight shooting and it’s warmth makes it ideal for portraiture. So in 2010, Kodak Portra 400 NC and Kodak Portra VC 400 both ceased to exist as they merged together and became the simple, singular Kodak Portra 400 we have today. Still, for completeness, I evaluated Portra 800 in this test as well. Overall, I preferred Portra 800 over 160 and 400 in most situations with a strict exception to portraits. Portra 400 vs. 160. The new film is easy to scan, according to reviews. For 35mm film I use Kodak Portra 160 and for medium format film normally Kodak Portra 400 and more recently Fuji Pro 400H again. At true ISO 400 speed, this film delivers spectacular skin tones plus exceptional color saturation over a wide range of lighting conditions. Soft colors, tons of detail and a dynamic range even better than Ektar. The control conditions were as follows: All films were developed at a local lab here in Columbus, OH and scanned at home using an Epson v600. At that time, Kodak made natural (NC) and vivid (VC) versions. Of the three, Portra 400 is the most popular stock for film photographers and the most popular color profile for those shoot digital that are looking to emulate the film look. Under-exposed images take on the dreaded green shadows so familiar to color negative shooters. Surprising Encounters in Landscape Photography, The Death of the Entry-Level DSLR Is Upon Us: Nikon Calls Time on the D3500 and D5600, 7 Editing Techniques Landscape Photographers Should Know, A Beginner's Guide to Effectively Using ISO for Better Photos, An Essay Only Nikon Shooters Will Appreciate. Fujifilm X100T + RNI Kodak Portra 160 Samples. Admittedly, this is by no means a scientific test- if I wanted to be more accurate I would need to test Portra 400 and 800, side to side under the same conditions. At a speed of ISO 400, it is fast enough for most scenarios.